Desperate
people advancing into Europe, described by politicians as constituting an “immigration
problem”—even as a “swarm” -- yet regarded
by many others as a reproach to our humanity and as an indictment of Western
policies. Somehow this scenario, now
being acted out in Turkey, Greece, Macedonia, Italy, Hungary… rings
a bell. It was twenty-five years ago in 1990, the
year when the cold war was crumbling and climate change became recognised by
the UN as the new threat, that the BBC produced a notable feature film called The
March. At the time said to be the most ambitious
production for TV ever made by the BBC, and directed by David Wheatley, it was
shown in 20 countries and had a huge impact.
A
charismatic leader in Sudan, Issa Al-Mahdi, leads his impoverished people out
of their refugee camp to march across northern Africa to the Straits of
Gibraltar, where they plan to cross into Europe. His message is “We are poor
because you are rich”, and he invites the affluent West to “watch us die”. At
first ignored, and almost destroyed by a band of armed marauders in the desert,
the marchers are saved by Libya which provides them with food and allows them
to transit through Algeria into Morocco. They then cross to Spain in a fleet of
ramshackle boats, and are met on the shore by armed soldiers. A seriously
conflicted European Commissioner for humanitarian aid (Juliet Stevenson) watches
from the sidelines, and tells Al-Mahdi that “We are just not ready for you
yet”.
1990 was the
year of change and of new hopes and fears. The decade ahead was called the
Decade of Decision when the post-cold war world would – or should -- come to
grips at last with a raft of problems from the Middle East and nuclear
proliferation to global warming and North-South inequality. The UN’s
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change produced its first report, in which
it warned that global temperatures (and global sea levels) would rise at a rate
greater than in the last 10,000 years unless action were taken swiftly. There
was
also much talk of the “peace dividend” which could provide the funds with which
to tackle all these problems.
Where are we
now, a quarter of a century later when Europe is facing in reality, not on the
TV screen, a new “march” of desperate people?
Yes, the UN Millennium Goals to reduce poverty and improve health and
education have been partially met but the benefits are spread very
unevenly. Though the phrase “North v
South” is less used, there is still a widely perceived divide. The world as a
whole has got richer, but as the Millennium Declaration put it, the benefits of
globalisation “are very unevenly shared, while its costs are unevenly
distributed”.
Into this
already unequal equation has been thrown over the past decade an explosive
source of further suffering and destabilisation – not one but several Western
interventions/invasions. Let us by all means take a balanced view: even without
Western invasion, the
dictatorial regimes of the Middle East including Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, the
Assad dynasty’s Syria, and Gaddafi’s Libya, --
regimes which the West sometimes opposed
and at other supported -- could not last for ever. Counter-factual
history is a speculative business but we may safely assume that the dissolution
of these regimes, whenever it came, was bound to be painful and their
trajectory uncertain.
Yet what was
going to be a difficult period of transition has been made exponentially worse
by occurring in a region already so seriously destabilised by an illegal war
(the phrase is that of UN Secretary General Kofi Annan) in Iraq, and covert regime
change (going well beyond the action
authorised by the Security Council) in Libya. We should also note that many of
the current refugees are fleeing from Afghanistan, where misguided policies of
intervention (of course starting with the former Soviet Union) have over more
than three decades done so much to nourish Islamist extremism.
So the new
march is driven by more complex forces than those presciently envisaged by the
BBC a quarter of a century ago. The question though remains the same: Are we
ready for them yet?